By Nathan 'Jolly' Green

I
suppose such a question could be condemned as racist. That I presume
depends on why the issue is being asked and is it meant to be racist?

Let
us press on, is there a possible underlying psychological reason for
black people in a predominately black country and black society not
only to choose a white leader but for some of the electorate to
almost worship the ground he walks on.

Is
there an innate desire by descendents of black slaves to be owned and
to serve white people? Do they feel safer with white masters than
black ones? Is it possible some of that desire runs in the genes of
many black people born of ex-slave societies?

When
you consider that mulattoes, and the paler the better, are more
respected by the black people than those who have some African
purity, is the gene influence a possibility, more so even a
probability?

It’s
not just in the Caribbean that you find this anomaly. In India the
railways are almost predominantly run by pale skinned Indians who are
proud to be called, proud to be recognised as, ‘Anglo-Indians’.
The Indian Parliament is totally transacted in the English language.
Pale skinned Indian women and girls are the preferred marriage
partner. Dark skinned girls are rejected by the middle and upper
society in India.

What
happens if the leader is chosen only because he is white, while in
actual life is a narcissist, fornicator, molester, and rapist of
black girls. He treats the majority of who he leads with contempt and
as dirty dogs, calling them nasty names, whilst rewarding those that
bow down at his feet, to scraps from his table? A man who has shown
immense spite to some black people going out of his way to destroy
them and their families socially and commercially? If such a man was
chosen by black people to lead, would that compound the belief that
“it runs in your genes” is it really possible?

I
think if such a leader behaves so, choosing him does run in the
genes, I can see no other explanation for a whole black nation, a
nation descended from a slavery ancestry to elect a white man that
has the qualities described in the previous paragraph.

Of
course there are many lovely white people who adore and love black
people. Some marry their chosen black partner. That is surely the way
it should be, to be chosen out of love and respect of each other.
There are good and bad in every race of this World, but to choose a
known bad person cannot be a free choice of any sane person, it has
to be an uncontrollable action, an inbred domination of you by your
genes.

Looking
at leadership, black or white, a person who is moral is concerned
with the principles of right and wrong behaviour and the goodness or
badness of human character. In spite of the prevailing moral
relativism or pluralism, if everybody always knows, wants, and
expects to be treated fairly and seeks after personal justice, then
morality is universally established.

So
what if the people choose a black leader and that leader turns out
worse than the white ‘gene chosen’ one? It may happen, it could
happen, but will it happen? We will never know until we try. But in
the scheme of things whatever the people do it cannot be worse than
being led by such a white man as described herein.

Nathan
‘Jolly’ Green

The situations described herein are brought from the back of my enquiring mind and are fictional and not meant to be about or relate to any particular person or situation, unless of course, the hat fits. (SEE IMAGE TOP)

END

DISCLAMER: The opinion, belief and viewpoint expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect the opinion, belief and viewpoint of iNews Cayman/ieyenews.com or official policies of iNews Cayman/ieyenews.com