The Editor speaks: Tinting v signaling

Archive
4 min read
The Editor speaks: Tinting v signaling
Colin Wilson

From the latest PR from the RCIPS:

“...over the past four days, 17–20
January, RCIPS officers issued 32 tickets for speeding, 63 tickets
for tint, 4 tickets for using a mobile phone while driving, and
prosecuted 4 persons for DUI. There were also 35 traffic collisions
recorded.”

I will highlight one of the items in
the above, in fact it was the one that carried the highest number of
tickets - 63 tickets for tint.

The one item I looked for was how many
tickets were issued for not signaling?

The answer – ZERO!

At the last Public Meeting involving
the police and the public the issue of motorists failing to signal,
especially at roundabouts, was raised by a number of people there.

The frustrations over the ticketing for
tints was also raised.

In both instances the police promised
they would look into it..

We know the answer.

I also ask how many of the 35 traffic
collisions recorded involved the failure of signaling?

Apparently that hasn't been recorded.

How many accidents have there ever been
that could be blamed on window tints?

We know the answer.

The priority given to tints over
signaling is even evident in the fines. Tints fine is $150. Signaling
is only $100.

The latest statistics reveal that…

One in five people in the country
would develop skin cancer before they reach the age of 70.

Even though the risk factor for skin
cancer is rather low for African Americans, Latinos, and Asians, skin
cancer can be the deadliest for these groups as well.

The American Cancer Society says that
men are twice more likely to get skin cancer than women.

The yearly expenditure of treating skin
cancer in the United States is a staggering $8.1 billion – $3.3
billion allocated for melanoma skin cancers and $4.8 billion
allocated for non-melanoma cancers.

In fact, the diagnosis of non melanoma
skin cancers has increased by 77% between 1994 and 2014.

More than 90% of these cases are due to
the exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun.

The latest studies have revealed that
window tinting and the prevention of skin cancer go hand in hand. A
high-quality window tint can drastically reduce your risk of skin
cancer while driving in the sun.

The damage caused by UVA rays are
long-term and not immediately noticeable. That is why most people
don’t immediately realize that their skin is being damaged from
sitting near the window in a car. Window glass can effectively block
UVB rays, while the windshield is typically treated to block UVA
rays. But the car’s rear and side windows will allow UVA rays to
come through and do damage to your skin. That is where an effective
and high-performance window tint comes in handy. The latest research
has revealed that window tinting and the prevention of skin cancer
are closely correlated.

A high-performance window tint will
offer all-day skin protection to help prevent skin cancer in the long
run. A properly installed quality tint can help block up to 99% of
harmful UV rays and provide a long-term solution to prevent the
occurrence of skin cancer.

SOURCE:
https://www.raynofilm.com/blog/skin-cancer-facts-window-tint

How Many People Actually Use Turn
Signals?

It seems fewer people are bothering to
signal before they turn or change lanes and signaling your intentions
at roundabouts is almost non-existent.

The fact is, signaling your intentions
to other drivers before you make a maneuver is an easy way to prevent
what could be a serious collision.

A study conducted by the Society of
Automotive Engineers (SAE) in 2012 found that 25 percent of drivers
fail to signal before making a left- or right-hand turn. Even more
drivers—48 percent—don't signal before changing lanes. I could
find no percentage data relating to roundabouts. However, if the
small roundabout at the end of the Linford Pierson Highway/Bobby
Thompson Way is anything to judge – I use it at least twice every
day (as I live off the LP Highway) it is one in five drivers that
signal.

Why, oh why, do I have to ask AGAIN and
AGAIN and AGAIN why is the police blind to the plain and clear fact
Tinting does not cause accidents but helps prevent skin cancer,
whilst Signaling helps prevents accidents?

Therefore, why isn't the police
priority reversed?

Published January 21, 2020

Join the discussion — please keep to our Community Guidelines.