By Jolly Green

Let there be no doubt whatsoever, the last three elections in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines were stolen through bribery and fraud. Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that has generally happened in Saint Vincent the States mainland island. It’s far more difficult for the fraud to take place in the Grenadines, because the people there traditionally dislike and distrust the Unity Labour Party, and are therefore fewer people who are willing to commit fraud on behalf of the ULP.

Electoral fraud, sometimes
referred to as election fraud, election manipulation, or vote
rigging, is illegal interference with the process of an election,
either by increasing the vote share of the favored candidate,
depressing the vote share of the rival candidates, or both. Plenty of
all kinds of electoral fraud have taken place in Saint Vincent. What
exactly constitutes electoral fraud varies from country to country,
but in Saint Vincent, the fraud has become blatantly transparent.

Many kinds of election fraud are
outlawed in electoral legislation, but others violate general laws,
such as those banning assault, harassment, or libel. Although
technically the term “electoral fraud” covers only those acts
which are illegal, the term is sometimes used to describe legal
actions, but considered morally unacceptable, outside the spirit of
an election or in violation of the principles of democracy.

In the Vincentian elections,
successful electoral fraud has had the effect of a coup d ‘état or
corruption of democracy. In SVG’s narrow elections, small amounts
of fraud may be enough to change the result. But in the case of the
Vincentian mainland, the fraud has been massive and on many fronts,
and with many methods. The revelation of this fraud has had a
damaging effect, and so far has gone unpunished; it has most
certainly reduced Vincentian voters’ confidence in democracy.

Electoral fraud has even occurred
in advance of voting. In many cases, the composition of the
electorate is altered. This type of manipulation took place across
all constituencies. Deliberate manipulation of our elections has
violated the principles of our democracy.

In many cases, authorities have
allowed the artificial control of the composition of the electorate
to produce an inevitable result. Doing this is to move large numbers
of voters into the electorate before an election, by temporarily
allowing even overseeing the re-registration of ULP voters in
constituencies where there are low numbers of ULP voters. Remember,
there are rules, stipulating that a voter must have lived in an
electoral district for a minimum period of six months to be eligible
to vote there, even that has been violated. Another strategy has been
to permanently move people into an electoral district, usually
through public or low-cost housing. People eligible for such housing
are expected to vote ULP; they are required to pledge to vote ULP to
qualify for those houses. Once concentrated into one area, they tip
the balance towards the ULP.

Votes have been stolen by stuffing
the voting boxes’ during the night while they are stored overnight
in police stations and elsewhere.

Immigration law has also been used
to manipulate electoral demography. For instance, anyone, including
students of age from other Commonwealth countries, can vote in
Vincentian elections once they have been resident for more than six
months in SVG. In past polls, numerous Nigerian students have been
encouraged to vote ULP, and being mobile can be required to live and
vote in the constituency most needing extra ULP votes. Currently,
Nigerian students in Nigeria are again being targeted to come to SVG
for this purpose.

In some cases, NDP voters have
been invalidly disenfranchised, which is actual electoral fraud. For
example, legitimate voters have been [supposedly accidentally]
removed from the electoral roll, which made it impossible for those
persons to vote.

Voter intimidation has occurred
involving undue pressure put on a voter or group of voters so that
they will vote a particular way, or not at all. Villages that hold
strong ULP support have victimized those voters who are known NDP
supporters and with threats deterred some citizens from attending
polling stations.

Plane loads of Vincentians from
the diaspora, who have not lived in the state for six months
continually past, were brought in by the ULP with their flights paid
for, to visit their families, and vote ULP at the same time. Voting
ULP is a requisite for the free trip.

Violence and the threat of
violence: Voters from particular villages known to support the ULP or
its candidate have been directly threatened to ensure everyone votes
ULP. In other cases, supporters of the ULP have made it known that if
a particular village or neighborhood is found to have voted the
‘wrong’ way, reprisals will be made against that community.

ULP supporters have used coercion
to control the voting ballot by persuading others to follow them. By
singling out those in the village or district who were against their
majority, they have then forced people to switch their voting
decision.

Vote buying by the ULP party and
the ULP government is widespread. Vote-buying as a monetary exchange
has taken place by candidates and ULP party leadership going into
towns and villages and distributing envelopes with 100 or 50 dollar
bills enclosed. This practice was used to incentivize or persuade
voters to turn out to elections and vote ULP.

The ULP has also hired runners to
go out into the public and find floating voters and bargain with them
to vote for their side, against cash payments or in some cases,
enough building materials to build a house. Voters were given money
or other rewards for voting ULP, or not voting NDP.

Vote buying and the overall
practice of clientelism is widespread in Saint Vincent. One of the
foremost perpetrators of these illegal activities is individual
members within the ULP party. The relationship between voters and
Gonsalvist candidates is such that voters are offered particular
goods, services, favors, or monetary compensation in exchange for
their political support for the ULP party. These rewards could
include a job, medicine, a roof, clothing, foods, animals, building
materials, and other goods or services. The case of Saint Vincent, in
particular, is that it relies heavily on face-to-face and day-to-day
interactions between “brokers” who act as middlemen and voters.
Since many of the communities in Saint Vincent are ridden with
poverty and require these particular resources, it is these
communities that have proven to be the demographics that were
targeted for vote-buying. Additionally, vote-buying in this region
focuses on citizens who are not firmly in favor or opposed to the
political machine, and whose political loyalty does not necessarily
lie with one party or another. ULP Vote buying acts as a mechanism to
sway the decisions of weakly opposed voters. They maintain
relationships with the voters and grant them rewards and favors
continuously to keep the ULP party in office. This is one main
explanation for why many lower-income voters are seen voting for the
ULP leadership, as well as authoritarian ones. Many citizens view
these brokers as concrete pillars in their lives and have the utmost
respect for the help they distribute. However, others see them as
hands of corruption. Stoking further explains that the capacity of
these brokers is constrained because they can only maintain this type
of transactional relationship with a limited number of voters.
Furthermore, the brokers have the additional responsibility of
maintaining trusting and reliable connections with their resource
suppliers. Without these strong ties, they will have no means through
which to carry out vote-buying practices.

Saint Vincent, under the Unity
Labour Party, has been wrecked, with people starving and children
being under-educated to a degree of hopelessness, one has to wonder
what comes next. The Vincentian leadership has taken people down a
road of despair, amalgamating, supporting, and joining hands
politically with crap states such as Cuba and Venezuela.

So who is basically to blame for
these actions? I directly blame Ralph Gonsalves, who has designed a
dynastical system, bringing his whole family into government to
support his actions and personal behavior.

Others outside the family support
the dynasty and receive rewards for doing so; even knighthoods have
been endowed on such supporters.

The whole ULP and the Gonsalves
dynasty is cancer on the people of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.
Gonsalves himself openly supporting and helping wherever possible the
dirty regimes of Maduro and the Castro’s.

Vincentians have never been in
such diabolical and dangerous consequences since the beginning of
time.

ttph://www.ieyenews.com/wordpress/opinion-as-saint-vincent-moves-from-pluralist-democracy-towards-dynastical-autocracy/

https://www.thenewtodaygrenada.com/letters/men-who-are-pollutants-in-their-own-right/

https://www.iwnsvg.com/2015/08/11/why-order-so-much-material-from-jamaica-comrade/

Jolly Green, “Democracy Dies in Darkness,” and these are dark days in SVG.

END

DISCLAMER: The opinion, belief and viewpoint expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect the opinion, belief and viewpoint of iNews Cayman/ieyenews.com or official policies of iNews Cayman/ieyenews.com